Coinbase is one of the leading cryptocurrency exchanges in the world. With millions of users, it boasts a great reputation in the industry. However, the exchange has recently found itself in a legal battle over alleged biometric privacy violations. In this article, we will explore the situation in detail and see what it means for the crypto market.
The Allegation
The lawsuit alleges that Coinbase secretly recorded users’ facial recognition data for authentication purposes without providing proper disclosures or obtaining consent. The plaintiffs in this case argue that Coinbase’s actions violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA).
Specifically, the plaintiffs claim that Coinbase’s face recognition technology violated BIPA, which requires companies to provide a written policy outlining their retention and destruction of biometric data. The CCPA, on the other hand, requires companies to inform users about the personal information they collect and give users the opportunity to opt-out of the data’s sale.
This case is part of a broader trend of users’ privacy concerns becoming more widespread, especially in the context of biometric data. As industries continue to innovate with biometric technology, there is a need to ensure that individuals’ personal information remains protected.
Coinbase’s Response
Coinbase has responded to these allegations, arguing that the plaintiffs cannot prove that their biometric information was stored and used by the company. Coinbase also asserts that it has followed the guidelines set out by the laws in question.
In a statement, Coinbase said, “We have only used facial recognition technology to match the verified identity of the user submitting the image with a copy of his or her ID. We have never used these tools for any other purpose, and we have always given our users the option to opt-out of this verification process.”
The company also emphasized that it takes the privacy of its users very seriously and has implemented a number of measures to ensure that their data is protected. This includes employing stringent verification processes and complying with various regulations.
What This Means for the Crypto Market
The outcome of this case could have significant ramifications on the crypto market. If the allegations against Coinbase are proven true, it could undermine the trust users have in the exchange. This could lead to users moving away from Coinbase to seek alternatives that better protect their privacy.
Additionally, it could also prompt regulators to take a closer look at the role of biometric technology in the crypto industry. This would likely lead to the introduction of additional laws and regulations aimed at protecting users’ privacy.
The use of biometric technology in the crypto market has been growing in recent years. For example, some exchanges require users to upload a selfie along with their government-issued ID to verify their identity. This is done to prevent fraud and ensure that only legitimate users can access the exchange.
However, as this lawsuit demonstrates, there are concerns about the use of biometric data, and they need to be addressed to ensure that users’ privacy is protected.
Conclusion
Coinbase is one of the most well-known and highly respected cryptocurrency exchanges in the world. However, it is facing legal challenges over allegations of biometric privacy violations. The outcome of this case will have significant implications for the crypto market.
Regardless of the outcome, however, this case highlights the need for greater attention to be paid to the use of biometric data in the crypto market. As the industry continues to evolve and innovate, it is important that the privacy of users is protected and that companies are held accountable for any violations.
The lawsuit, filed on May 1st, claims that Coinbase has violated Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting, storing, and distributing customers’ biometric data without proper consent. The plaintiff, Michael Massel, is seeking relief in damages for every violation of BIPA discovered by his legal representation.
BIPA regulations require companies collecting biometric data to inform individuals in writing about this process and specify the purpose and duration of the data’s storage. In addition, written consent from the customer is required, and companies must publicly announce their retention schedules and guidelines for permanently destroying biometric identifiers and biometric information.
Massel’s legal team alleges that Coinbase fails to comply with these regulations when collecting customer data during and after creating new accounts. They argue that Coinbase’s “collection, obtainment, storage, and use” of customers’ biometric data is “unlawful” and exposes clients to “serious and irreversible privacy risks.”
The lawsuit also contends that if Coinbase’s database containing facial geometry scans or other sensitive biometric data is hacked, breached, or otherwise exposed, Coinbase users have no means to prevent identity theft. Furthermore, the exchange should have “permanently destroyed” such data after a customer created a Coinbase account since the information was obtained solely for account creation purposes.
This lawsuit highlights the importance of companies complying with regulations regarding the collection and storage of biometric data. As biometric authentication methods become more prevalent in various industries, including finance, healthcare, and security, protecting individuals’ sensitive information is critical.
Moreover, this lawsuit serves as a reminder for individuals to monitor their data privacy and take appropriate measures to protect themselves from potential breaches or misuse. Implementing strong passwords, enabling two-factor authentication, and being cautious about sharing personal information online can go a long way in safeguarding one’s personal data.
In conclusion,
